Advanced Analytics
Data-driven insights, performance analysis, and comprehensive rally statistics
13
Rallies This Season
156
Special Stages
2,847
Total KM Analyzed
Championship Points Progression
Neuville
Evans
Stage Win Distribution
Neuville (54)
Evans (44)
Tänak (34)
Others (23)
Driver Performance Comparison
Stage Performance Analysis
| Stage | Surface | Winner | Time | Avg Speed | Gap to 2nd | Weather |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SS12 - Col de Turini | Mixed | T. NEUVILLE | 7:23.4 | 95.6 km/h | +2.3s | Dry |
| SS11 - Peille | Tarmac | E. EVANS | 11:45.2 | 96.8 km/h | +1.7s | Light Rain |
| SS10 - La Bollène | Mixed | O. TÄNAK | 14:32.8 | 95.9 km/h | +0.9s | Dry |
Performance Trends
Average Time Gap
Consistency Index
Key Insights
Consistency Leader
Neuville shows 15% better consistency on mixed surface stages
compared to pure tarmac.
Weather Advantage
Evans performs 8.3% better in wet conditions, gaining an
average of 1.2s per stage.
Surface Specialist
Tänak leads gravel stage wins with 67% success rate on
technical sections.
Peak Performance
Current form shows 23% improvement in sector times compared to
season average.
Detailed Stage Analysis
Performance Heatmap - Last 10 Stages
1
3
2
4
1
2
5
1
3
4
Numbers represent stage position. Green = Podium finish, Orange = Top 5, Red = Below 5th place.
Sector Performance Breakdown
Sector 1 (Technical)
- Average Gap+0.3s
- Best PerformanceSS8 (-1.2s)
- Consistency87%
Sector 2 (High Speed)
- Average Gap-0.7s
- Best PerformanceSS12 (-2.1s)
- Consistency92%
Weather Impact Analysis
Performance variation under different conditions
Dry Conditions
- Stages Won12/18
- Podium Rate94%
- Avg Position1.8
Wet Conditions
- Stages Won8/12
- Podium Rate83%
- Avg Position2.1
Strategic Analysis
Tire choices and setup decisions impact
Tire Strategy
- Soft Compound67% success
- Medium Compound45% success
- Hard Compound23% success
Setup Preference
- Stability Focus78% of stages
- Speed Focus22% of stages
- Success Rate85% vs 67%